- Provided guiding questions--always with a focus on the process (who are you? what did this project mean to you? why? how did you make it: technology, influences from program? what did you need to learn in order to develop the project? who helped you?).
- We left them to write and then went around and helped them as they wrote (cleaning up mostly spelling, grammar, sentence structure).
- I would always read their statements aloud to them, so they could hear their own words, and at times, make corrections on their own.
- We never took statements away to review or edit and hand back with red ink marks. We always did the editing with the students, so we had their permission and they were part of the process. I wanted them to understand the changes.
- We talked about the difference between spoken and written language, and how they needed to not take anything for granted. They shouldn't expect that their audience knows anything about their project or process.
- Find common language. "Process" wasn't really a part of my students' vocabulary, which took me a while to understand. 'How did you get from point A to point B' worked.
- Focus: presenting their work to the world.
Instant Story Exercise with Christina Kral
The goal of this exercise was to allow for a different reality, and give the participants the most absurd and abstract stories by the act of listening, looking and documenting images and sounds from the public.
[ARTIST STATEMENT TEMPLATE]:
Tell us about your world.
How did you think of this world?
What were the technologies, tools, resources and influences (for example: guest lecturers, teaching artists, work you saw during the program or before) that you used to make this world?
What are your group members’ names?
[PROJECT DESCRIPTION TEMPLATE]:
World description/narrative:
What is the name of your world?
What is your world?
Where is it?
What’s the point of it? Why does it exist?
What happens there?
How does one get there?
No comments:
Post a Comment